Detecting Current Noise with a Josephson Junction in the Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling Regime
J. T. Peltonen, A. V. Timofeev, M. Meschke, J. P. Pekola
arXiv:cond-mat/0611593 · 2006-11-22
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss the use of a hysteretic Josephson junction to detect current fluctuations with frequencies below the plasma frequency of the junction. These adiabatic fluctuations are probed by switching measurements observing the noise-affected average rate of macroscopic quantum tunneling of the detector junction out of its zero-voltage state. In a proposed experimental scheme, frequencies of the noise are limited by an on-chip filtering circuit. The third cumulant of current fluctuations at the detector is related to an asymmetry of the switching rates.
Similar papers
Dependence of the Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling Rate on Josephson Junction Area
similarity 0.92Christoph Kaiser et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.4241
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Half-integer Shapiro steps in highly transmissive InSb nanoflag Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90Andrea Iorio et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05951
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson-based scheme for the detection of microwave photons
similarity 0.90Claudio Guarcello et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.00976
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of a 4-periodic supercurrent in the voltage response of capacitively shunted topological Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90Jordi Picó-Cortés et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.09100
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diffusion and suppression of the supercurrent by quantum-mechanical fluctuations of the Josephson plasma
similarity 0.89Kurt Gloos & Frithjof Anders · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9905294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diffusion and charging effects in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Hermann Grabert et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9801172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified