Are pinholes the cause of excess current in superconducting tunnel junctions? A study of Andreev current in highly resistive junctions
Tine Greibe, Markku P. V. Stenberg, C. M. Wilson, Thilo Bauch, Vitaly S. Shumeiko, Per Delsing
arXiv:1009.1248 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.097001 · 2010-09-07 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In highly resistive superconducting tunnel junctions, excess subgap current is usually observed and is often attributed to microscopic "pinholes" in the tunnel barrier. We have studied the subgap current in superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) and superconductor-insulator-normal-metal (SIN) junctions. In Al/AlOx/Al junctions, we observed a decrease of 2 orders of magnitude in the current upon the transition from the SIS to the SIN regime, where it then matched theory. In Al/AlOx/Cu junctions, we also observed generic features of coherent diffusive Andreev transport in a junction with a homogenous barrier. We use the quasiclassical Keldysh-Green function theory to quantify single- and two-particle tunneling and find good agreement over 2 orders of magnitude in transparency. We argue that our observations rule out pinholes as the origin of the excess current.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Are “Pinholes” the Cause of Excess Current in Superconducting Tunnel Junctions? A Study of Andreev Current in Highly Resistive Junctions
similarity 0.93Tine Greibe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of multiple Andreev reflections in superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.89A. W. Kleinsasser et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooling, conductance and thermometric performance of non-ideal normal metal-superconductor tunnel junction pairs
similarity 0.88S. Chaudhuri & I. J. Maasilta · 2011 · arXiv:1112.0197
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Subgap conductivity in SIN-junctions of high barrier transparency
similarity 0.88S. V. Lotkhov et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0605237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport phenomena in superconducting hybrid nanostructures
similarity 0.88A. Ozaeta · 2014 · arXiv:1409.7805
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev current and subgap conductance of spin-valve SFF structures
similarity 0.87A. S. Vasenko et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.4741
Source status unknown — claims are unverified