Quantitative evaluation of defect-models in superconducting phase qubits
J. H. Cole, C. Müller, P. Bushev, G. J. Grabovskij, J. Lisenfeld, A. Lukashenko, A. V. Ustinov, A. Shnirman
arXiv:1010.6037 · DOI 10.1063/1.3529457 · 2010-10-28 · Applied Physics Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use high-precision spectroscopy and detailed theoretical modelling to determine the form of the coupling between a superconducting phase qubit and a two-level defect. Fitting the experimental data with our theoretical model allows us to determine all relevant system parameters. A strong qubit-defect coupling is observed, with a nearly vanishing longitudinal component. Using these estimates, we quantitatively compare several existing theoretical models for the microscopic origin of two-level defects.
Similar papers
Analysis of measurement errors for a superconducting phase qubit
similarity 0.91Qin Zhang et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0607385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence of a Josephson qubit due to coupling to two level systems
similarity 0.89Li-Chung Ku & Clare C. Yu · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0409006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of microwave spectroscopy of Andreev bound states with a Josephson junction
similarity 0.89L. Bretheau et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.6301
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-boson model with an engineered reservoir in circuit quantum electrodynamics
similarity 0.89Max Haeberlein et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.09114
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double resonance response of a superconducting quantum metamaterial: manifestation of non-classical states of photons
similarity 0.88M. A. Iontsev et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.09078
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In-situ tunable interaction with an invertible sign between a fluxonium and a post cavity
similarity 0.88Desislava G. Atanasova et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.07612
Source status unknown — claims are unverified