Conductance and Thermopower of Ballistic Andreev Cavities
Thomas Engl, Jack Kuipers, Klaus Richter
arXiv:1012.3385 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.205414 · 2010-12-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When coupling a superconductor to a normal conducting region the physical properties of the system are highly affected by the superconductor. We will investigate the effect of one or two superconductors on the conductance of a ballistic chaotic quantum dot to leading order in the total channel number using trajectory based semiclassics. The results show that the effect of one superconductor on the conductance is of the order of the number of channels and that the sign of the correction from the Drude conductance depends on the particular ratios of the numbers of channels of the superconducting and normal conducting leads. In the case of two superconductors with the same chemical potential we will also see how the conductance and the sign of quantum corrections are affected by their phase difference. As far as random matrix theory results exist these are reproduced by our calculations. Furthermore in the case that the chemical potential of the superconductors is the same as that of one of the two normal leads the conductance shows, under certain conditions, similar effects as a normal metal-superconductor junction. The semiclassical framework is also able to treat the thermopower of chaotic Andreev billiards consisting of one chaotic dot, two normal leads and two superconducting islands and shows it to be antisymmetric in the phase difference of the superconductors.
Similar papers
Conductance and thermopower of ballistic Andreev cavities
similarity 0.92Thomas Engl et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase coherent transport in hybrid superconducting nanostructures
similarity 0.90C. J. Lambert & R. Raimondi · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9708056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflections at large ferromagnet/high-T_C superconductor area junctions with rough interface
similarity 0.89N. Ghosh et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.2131
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Recent Progress of Point Contact Spectroscopy as a Probe of Correlated Electron States
similarity 0.89Wei-Cheng Lee & Laura H. Greene · 2015 · arXiv:1512.02660
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct observation of ballistic Andreev reflection
similarity 0.88T. M. Klapwijk & S. A. Ryabchun · 2014 · arXiv:1408.3508
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in layered structures: implications for high T_c grain boundary Josephson junctions
similarity 0.88A. A. Golubov & F. Tafuri · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified