Direct observation of ballistic Andreev reflection
T. M. Klapwijk, S. A. Ryabchun
arXiv:1408.3508 · DOI 10.1134/S106377611412005X · 2014-08-15 · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An overview is presented of experiments on ballistic electrical transport in inhomogeneous superconducting systems which are controlled by the process of Andreev reflection. The initial experiments based on the coexistence of a normal phase and a superconducting phase in the intermediate state led to the concept itself. It was followed by a focus on geometrically inhomogeneous systems like point contacts, which provided a very clear manifestation of the energy- and directional dependence of the Andreev reflection process. The point contacts have in recent years evolved towards the atomic scale by using mechanical break-junctions, revealing in a very detailed way the dependence of Andreev reflection on the macroscopic phase of the superconducting state. In present day research the superconducting inhomogeneity is constructed by clean room technology and combines superconducting materials with, for example, low-dimensional materials and topological insulators. Alternatively the superconductor is combined with nano-objects, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, or semiconducting nanowires. Each of these 'inhomogeneous systems' provides a very interesting range of properties, all rooted in some manifestation of Andreev reflection.
Similar papers
Supercurrent switching in Three- and Four- Terminal Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.88H. Tolga Ilhan & Philip F. Bagwell · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reflectionless tunneling in planar Nb/GaAs hybrid junctions
similarity 0.88Francesco Giazotto et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102053
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductance and Thermopower of Ballistic Andreev Cavities
similarity 0.88Thomas Engl et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1012.3385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Square-well model for superconducting pair-potential
similarity 0.88Erkki Thuneberg · 2024 · arXiv:2405.07659
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection and geometrical resonance effects for a gradual variation of the pair potential near the normal-metal–superconductor interface
similarity 0.88P. C. van Son et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in Si-engineered Al/InGaAs hybrid junctions
similarity 0.87Silvano De Franceschi et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9811338
Source status unknown — claims are unverified