← Back to search

Are the high-Tc superconductors strongly correlated electron systems?

X. Q. Huang

arXiv:1103.4647 · 2011-03-23 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T3

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the high-temperature superconductors do not belong to strong correlated electron systems. It is shown that both the two-dimensional Hubbard and t-J models are inadequate for describing high temperature superconductivity. In our opinion, a superconducting phase should be an energy minimum electronic state which can be described in a new framework where the electron-electron interactions (both on-site Hubbard term and off-site term) and the electron-phonon interaction can be completely suppressed.

Similar papers

A Real Space Description of the Superconducting and Pseudogap Phase

similarity 0.90

X. Q. Huang · 2009 · arXiv:0910.5511

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Strong-coupling superconductivity beyond BCS and the key pairing interaction in cuprate superconductors

similarity 0.89

A. S. Alexandrov · 2010 · arXiv:1012.5194

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Competition between spin exchange and correlated hopping

similarity 0.89

Y. Saiga & M. Imada · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110458

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Strong pairing from small Fermi surface beyond weak coupling: Application to La $_{3}$ Ni $_{2}$ O $_{7}$

similarity 0.89

Hui Yang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.15095

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

A real-space effective c-axis lattice constant theory of superconductivity

similarity 0.89

Huang, X. Q. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.5067

Source status unknown — claims are unverified

Universal properties of high-temperature superconductors from real-space pairing III: The role of correlated hopping and intersite Coulomb interaction within the t-J-U model

similarity 0.89

Michał Zegrodnik & Józef Spałek · 2017 · arXiv:1705.06038

Source status unknown — claims are unverified