How robust the global measurements of London penetration depth are: the case of Fe(Te$_{1-x}$,Se$_{x}$)
K. Cho, H. Kim, M. A. Tanatar, J. Hu, B. Qian, Z. Q. Mao, R. Prozorov
arXiv:1107.0711 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174502 · 2011-07-04 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report tunnel diode resonator measurements of in-plane London penetration depth, $λ(T)$, in optimally-doped single crystals of Fe(Te$_{0.58}$Se$_{0.42}$) with $T_c\sim$ 14.8 K. Systematic measurements were carried out for six samples with different size and surface roughness. The power-law behavior, $Δλ(T) = A T^n$ was found for all samples with the average exponent $n_{avg} = 2.3 \pm 0.1$ and the pre-factor $A_{avg} = 1.0 \pm 0.2$ nm/K$^{2.3}$. The average superfluid density is well described by the self-consistent two-gap $γ$ model resulting in $Δ_{_{I}}(0)/k_B T_c$ = 1.93 and $Δ_{_{II}}(0)/k_B T_c$ = 0.9. By analyzing the data obtained on samples of different size and deliberately introduced surface roughness, it is concluded that the calibration procedure used to obtain $λ(T)$ from the measured TDR frequency shift is quite robust and the uncertainty in sample dimensions and the nature of surface roughness play only minor role. The exponent $n$, directly related to the superconducting gap structure, remains virtually unchanged. The calibration - dependent pre-factor $A$ shows some variation, but stays within reasonable margin ruling out some recent suggestions that surface conditions can significantly affect the results. Our results confirm that precision global measurements provide the most objective information regarding temperature - dependent London penetration depth.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe(Te0.58Se0.42) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Fey(Te1-xSex) Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Direct Evidence of Two Superconducting Gaps in FeSeTe: SnS-Andreev Spectroscopy and Lower Critical Field
similarity 0.90T. E. Kuzmicheva et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.06140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
London penetration depth and superfluid density in single crystals of Fe(Te,Se) and Fe(Te,S) superconductors
similarity 0.90H. Kim et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.2042
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Using electron irradiation to probe iron - based superconductors
similarity 0.90Kyuil Cho et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.01956
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Superconductivity Mediated by Nematic Fluctuations in a Multi-Orbital System -- Application to doped FeSe
similarity 0.89Kazi Ranjibul Islam & Andrey Chubukov · 2024 · arXiv:2412.07008
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple energy gap features of superconducting FeSe investigated by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.89Eike Venzmer et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.01877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic superconducting properties of single-crystalline FeSe0.5Te0.5
similarity 0.89M. Bendele et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1004.0812
Source status unknown — claims are unverified