Multiple energy gap features of superconducting FeSe investigated by tunneling spectroscopy

Eike Venzmer; Alexander Kronenberg; Martin Jourdan

doi:10.1007/s10948-015-3364-3

← Back to search

Multiple energy gap features of superconducting FeSe investigated by tunneling spectroscopy

Eike Venzmer, Alexander Kronenberg, Martin Jourdan

arXiv:1506.01877 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-015-3364-3 · 2015-06-05 · Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism

T1theoretical6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Planar tunneling junctions of the presumably unconventional superconductor FeSe were prepared and investigated. The junctions consisted of FeSe/AlOx/Ag multilayers patterned lithographically into mesa structures. Bias voltage dependent differential conductivities dI/dV(V) of junctions in the tunneling, intermediate barrier strength, and metallic regimes were investigated. Depending on the barrier type between two and four features of the conductivity were obtained, which are discussed in the framework of multiple superconducting energy gaps. Specifically we reproduced with all barrier types an established energy gap and discovered an additional large gap structure. From two further conductivity features presumable one originates from another superconducting gap and the other from resonant states.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	8.5	Pressure not reported	unknown
FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	37	4.1 GPa	unknown
FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	5	Pressure not reported	unknown