First-principles Electronic Structure of Superconductor Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$P$_2$: Comparison with LaFePO and Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$As$_2$
Taichi Kosugi, Takashi Miyake, Shoji Ishibashi
arXiv:1109.2054 · 2011-09-09
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the electronic structures of iron-based superconductors having perovskite-like blocking layers, %Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$ from first principles. Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$P$_2$ and Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$As$_2$ from first principles. Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$P$_2$ is found to have two hole-like Fermi surfaces around $Γ$, and one hole-like Fermi surface around M in the unfolded Brillouin zone. This is in contrast with LaFePO, where no Fermi surface is found around M. The relationship of their band structures and measured transition temperatures of superconductivity is discussed. The number of Fermi surfaces in Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$P$_2$ is also different from that of Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$As$_2$, in which only one Fermi surface is formed around $Γ$. Analysis using maximally localized Wannier functions clarifies that the differences between their band structures originate mainly from the pnictogen height. We then analyze the alloying effect on the electronic structure of Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$AsP. It is found that its electronic structure is similar to that of Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$P$_2$ and Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$As$_2$ with the average crystal structure, though Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$AsP contains the pnictogen height disorder. We calculate the generalized susceptibility for Ca$_4$Al$_2$O$_6$Fe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$ and clarify the factors determining its tendency.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaFePO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaFeAsO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SmFeAsO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 55 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ca4Al2O6Fe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ca4Al2O6Fe2P2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity under pressure in FeAsOF (=La, CeSm) by dc magnetization measurements
similarity 0.91Kiyotaka Miyoshi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.0917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of the superconducting gap by nesting in CaKFe4As4 - a new high temperature superconductor
similarity 0.90Daixiang Mou et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.05643
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Superconductivity on the Tetragonal Lattice in FeSe under Hydrostatic Pressure
similarity 0.90Kiyotaka Miyoshi et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1310.7546
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anion height as a controlling parameter for the superconductivity in iron pnictides and cuprates
similarity 0.89Kazuhiko Kuroki · 2010 · arXiv:1008.2286
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic Structure of Novel Superconductor Ca4Al2O6Fe2As2
similarity 0.89Takashi Miyake et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1009.5522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
To What Extent Iron-Pnictide New Superconductors Have Been Clarified: A Progress Report
similarity 0.89Kenji Ishida et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0906.2045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified