A Field-directional Specific Heat Study on the Gap Structure of Overdoped Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$
Gang Mu, Jun Tang, Yoichi Tanabe, Jingtao Xu, Bin Zeng, Bing Shen, Fei Han, Hai-Hu Wen, Satoshi Heguri, Katsumi Tanigaki
arXiv:1110.3403 · 2011-10-15
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Low-temperature specific heat is measured on the overdoped Ba(Fe_{1-x}Co_x)_2As_2 (x = 0.13) single crystal under magnetic fields along three different directions. A clear anisotropy is observed on the field dependent electronic specific heat coefficient γ(H). The value of γ(H) is obviously larger with magnetic field along [001] (c-axis) than that within the ab-plane of the crystal lattice, which cannot be attributed to the effect by anisotropy of the upper critical field. Meanwhile, the data show a rather small difference when the direction of the field is rotated from [100] to [110] direction within the ab-plane. Our results suggest that a considerable part of the line nodes is not excited to contribute to the quasiparticle density of states by the field when the field is within the ab-plane. The constraints on the topology of the gap nodes are discussed based on our observations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| LaFePO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LiFeP Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KxFe2-ySe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(As0.7P0.3)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Robust nodal superconductivity induced by isovalent doping in Ba(FeRu)As and BaFe(AsP)
similarity 0.93X. Qiu et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.2421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localized High Frequency Electrodynamic Behavior of Optimally-doped Ba(FeCo)As Single Crystal films
similarity 0.93Tamin Tai et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.03318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal superconducting gap structure in ferropnictide superconductor BaFe2(As0.7P0.3)2
similarity 0.92Y. Zhang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.0229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Volovik Effect in the ±s-Wave State for the Iron-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.91Yunkyu Bang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specific heat to Hc2: Evidence for nodes or deep minima in the superconducting gap of underdoped and overdoped Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2
similarity 0.91J. S. Kim et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting gap structure of BaFe_2(As_{1-x}P_{x})_2
similarity 0.91L. Malone et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.7523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified