Pure dephasing in flux qubits due to flux noise with spectral density scaling as $1/ f^α$
S. M. Anton, C. Müller, J. S. Birenbaum, S. R. O'Kelley, A. D. Fefferman, D. S. Golubev, G. C. Hilton, H. -M. Cho, K. D. Irwin, F. C. Wellstood, Gerd Schön, A. Shnirman, John Clarke
arXiv:1111.7272 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.224505 · 2011-11-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For many types of superconducting qubits, magnetic flux noise is a source of pure dephasing. Measurements on a representative dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) over a range of temperatures show that $S_Φ(f) = A^2/(f/1 \hbox{Hz})^α$, where $S_Φ$ is the flux noise spectral density, $A$ is of the order of 1 $μΦ_0 \, \hbox{Hz}^{-1/2}$ and $0.61 \leq α\leq 0.95$; $Φ_{0}$ is the flux quantum. For a qubit with an energy level splitting linearly coupled to the applied flux, calculations of the dependence of the pure dephasing time $τ_φ$ of Ramsey and echo pulse sequences on $α$ for fixed $A$ show that $τ_φ$ decreases rapidly as $α$ is reduced. We find that $τ_φ$ is relatively insensitive to the noise bandwidth, $f_1 \leq f \leq f_2$, for all $α$ provided the ultraviolet cutoff frequency $f_2 > 1/τ_φ$. We calculate the ratio $τ_{φ,E} / τ_{φ,R}$ of the echo ($E$) and Ramsey ($R$) sequences, and the dependence of the decay function on $α$ and $f_2$. We investigate the case in which $S_Φ(f_0)$ is fixed at the "pivot frequency" $f_0 \neq 1$ Hz while $α$ is varied, and find that the choice of $f_0$ can greatly influence the sensitivity of $τ_{φ,E}$ and $τ_{φ,R}$ to the value of $α$. Finally, we present calculated values of $τ_φ$ in a qubit corresponding to the values of $A$ and $α$ measured in our SQUID.
Similar papers
1/f Flux Noise in Josephson Phase Qubits
similarity 0.92Radoslaw C. Bialczak et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.2125
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Floquet Fluxonium Molecule: Driving Down Dephasing in Coupled Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.91Matthew Thibodeau et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.08762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-vector model of spin noise in superconducting circuits: Electron versus nuclear spins and role of phase transition
similarity 0.91S. LaForest & Rogerio de Sousa · 2015 · arXiv:1501.03776
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Noise in Flux Qubits via Macroscopic Resonant Tunneling
similarity 0.90R. Harris et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.0838
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence of flux qubits due to 1/f flux noise
similarity 0.90F. Yoshihara et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606481
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nb nano superconducting quantum interference devices with high spin sensitivity for operation in magnetic fields up to 0.5\,T
similarity 0.90Roman Wölbing et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.7584
Source status unknown — claims are unverified