Driven superconducting proximity effect in interacting quantum dots
Ali G. Moghaddam, Michele Governale, Jürgen König
arXiv:1201.5032 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.094518 · 2012-01-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a theory of non-equilibrium superconducting proximity effect in an interacting quantum dot induced by a time-dependent tunnel coupling between dot and a superconducting lead. The proximity effect, that is established when the driving frequency fulfills a gate-voltage-dependent resonance condition, can be probed through the tunneling current into a weakly-coupled normal lead. Furthermore, we propose to generate and manipulate coherent superpositions of quantum-dot states with electron numbers differing by two, by applying pulsed oscillatory variations to the couplings between dot and superconductors.
Similar papers
Tunable Superconducting Coupling of Quantum Dots via Andreev Bound States in Semiconductor-Superconductor Nanowires
similarity 0.91Chun-Xiao Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent description of Andreev bound states in Josephson quantum dot devices
similarity 0.90Tobias Meng et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0902.1111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multipair dc Josephson resonances in a biased all-superconducting bijunction
similarity 0.90T. Jonckheere et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transient effects in a double quantum dot sandwiched laterally between superconducting and metallic leads
similarity 0.90R. Taranko et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in interacting double-dot systems
similarity 0.90Eldridge, James et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.1790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higgs-like pair amplitude dynamics in superconductor-quantum dot hybrids
similarity 0.90Mathias Kamp & Björn Sothmann · 2020 · arXiv:2010.00535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified