Superconducting proximity effect in interacting double-dot systems
Eldridge, James, Pala, Marco G., Governale, Michele, König, Jürgen
arXiv:1006.1790 · 2010-11-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study subgap transport from a superconductor through a double quantum dot with large on-site Coulomb repulsion to two normal leads. Non-local superconducting correlations in the double dot are induced by the proximity to the superconducting lead, detectable in non-local Andreev transport that splits Cooper pairs in locally separated, spin-entangled electrons. We find that the $I$--$V$ characteristics are strongly asymmetric: for a large bias voltage of certain polarity, transport is blocked by populating the double dot with states whose spin symmetry is incompatible with the superconductor. Furthermore, by tuning gate voltages one has access to splitting of the Andreev excitation energies, which is visible in the differential conductance.
Similar papers
Entanglement-symmetry control in a quantum-dot Cooper-pair splitter
similarity 0.94Robert Hussein et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1609.01902
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper quartets in interacting hybrid superconducting systems
similarity 0.94Luca Chirolli et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.04202
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in interacting double-dot systems
similarity 0.93James Eldridge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Driven superconducting proximity effect in interacting quantum dots
similarity 0.93Ali G. Moghaddam et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1201.5032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting electron and hole lenses
similarity 0.92Hosein Cheraghchi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.06892
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase and Thermal Driven Transport across T-Shaped Double Quantum Dot Josephson Junction
similarity 0.92Bhupendra Kumar et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.03047
Source status unknown — claims are unverified