Obtaining gauge invariant actions via symplectic embedding formalism
E. M. C. Abreu, J. Ananias Neto, A. C. R. Mendes, C. Neves, W. Oliveira
arXiv:1205.7064 · DOI 10.1002/andp.201100199 · 2012-05-31 · Annalen der Physik
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The concept of gauge invariance is one of the most subtle and useful concepts in modern theoretical physics. It is one of the Standard Model cornerstones. The main benefit due to the gauge invariance is that it can permit the comprehension of difficult systems in physics with an arbitrary choice of a reference frame at every instant of time. It is the objective of this work to show a path of obtaining gauge invariant theories from non-invariant ones. Both are named also as first- and second-class theories respectively, obeying Dirac's formalism. Namely, it is very important to understand why it is always desirable to have a bridge between gauge invariant and non-invariant theories. Once established, this kind of mapping between first-class (gauge invariant) and second-class systems, in Dirac's formalism can be considered as a sort of equivalence. This work describe this kind of equivalence obtaining a gauge invariant theory starting with a non-invariant one using the symplectic embedding formalism developed by some of us some years back. To illustrate the procedure it was analyzed both Abelian and non-Abelian theories. It was demonstrated that this method is more convenient than others. For example, it was shown exactly that this embedding method used here does not require any special modification to handle with non-Abelian systems.
Similar papers
Entanglement and exotic superfluidity in spin-imbalanced lattices
similarity 0.85Vivian V. França · 2017 · arXiv:1708.08894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SU(2) gauge theory of the pseudogap phase in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.85Pietro M. Bonetti & Walter Metzner · 2022 · arXiv:2207.00829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson bifurcation readout: beyond the monochromatic approximation
similarity 0.85Yuriy Makhlin & Alexander B. Zorin · 2024 · arXiv:2405.16366
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Projected Proca Field Theory: a One-Loop Study
similarity 0.85R. F. Ozela et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.11339
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum anomalies in superconducting Weyl metals
similarity 0.85Rui Wang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1602.05138
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frustrated superconductivity and intrinsic reduction of in trilayer nickelate
similarity 0.84Qiong Qin et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.04340
Source status unknown — claims are unverified