Frustrated superconductivity and intrinsic reduction of $T_c$ in trilayer nickelate
Qiong Qin, Jiangfan Wang, Yi-feng Yang
arXiv:2405.04340 · DOI 10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.100102. · 2024-05-07 · The Innovation Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Identifying the key factors controlling the magnitude of $T_c$ is of critical importance in the pursuit of high-temperature superconductivity. In cuprates, $T_c$ reaches its maximal value in trilayer structure, leading to the belief that interlayer coupling may help promote the pairing. In contrast, for the recently discovered nickelate superconductors under high pressure, the maximum $T_c$ is reduced from about 80 K in the bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_{7}$ to 30 K in the trilayer La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$. Motivated by this opposite trend, we propose an interlayer pairing scenario for the superconductivity of La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$. Our theory reveals intrinsic frustration in the spin-singlet pairing that the inner layer tends to form with both of the two outer layers respectively, leading to strong superconducting fluctuations between layers. This explains the reduction of its maximum $T_c$ compared to that of the bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_{7}$. Our findings support a fundamental distinction between multilayer nickelate and cuprate superconductors, and ascribe it to their different (interlayer versus intralayer) pairing mechanisms. Furthermore, our theory predicts extended $s^\pm$-wave gap structures in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$, with varying signs and possible nodes on different Fermi pockets. We also find an intrinsic Josephson coupling with potentially interesting consequences that may be examined in future experiments. Our work reveals the possibility of rich novel physics in multilayer superconductors with interlayer pairing.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La4Ni3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La4Ni3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pairing Instabilities of the Yukawa-SYK Models with Controlled Fermion Incoherence
similarity 0.91Wonjune Choi et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.02968
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermion-fermion interaction driven phase transitions in rhombohedral trilayer graphene
similarity 0.91Qiao-Chu Zhang & Jing Wang · 2024 · arXiv:2406.01877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Floquet engineering of effective pairing interactions in a doped band insulator
similarity 0.91Yugo Takahashi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.07653
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent theory of pair density waves in kagome superconductors
similarity 0.91Meng Yao et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.03056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Discontinuous Transition to Superconducting Phase
similarity 0.91Takumi Sato et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.02211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid phase transition of nanoscale-confined helium-3
similarity 0.91Canon Sun et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.08808
Source status unknown — claims are unverified