Superfluid phase transition of nanoscale-confined helium-3
Canon Sun, Adil Attar, Igor Boettcher
arXiv:2307.08808 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.144503 · 2023-07-17 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate the superfluid phase transition of helium-3 under nanoscale confinement of one spatial dimension realized in recent experiments. Instead of the 3x3 complex matrix order parameter found in the three-dimensional system, the quasi two-dimensional superfluid is described by a reduced 3x2 complex matrix. It features a nodal quasiparticle spectrum, regardless of the value of the order parameter. The origin of the 3x2 order parameter is first illustrated via the two-particle Cooper problem, where Cooper pairs in the $p_x$ and $p_y$ orbitals are shown to have a lower bound state energy than those in $p_z$ orbitals, hinting at their energetically favorable role at the phase transition. We then compute the Landau free energy under confinement within the mean-field approximation and show that the critical temperature for condensation of the 3x2 order parameter is larger than for other competing phases. Through exact minimization of the mean-field free energy, we show that mean-field theory predicts precisely two energetically degenerate superfluid orders to emerge at the transition that are not related by symmetry: the A-phase and the planar phase. Beyond the mean-field approximation, we show that strong-coupling corrections favor the A-phase observed in experiment, whereas weak-coupling perturbative renormalization group predicts the planar phase to be stable.
Similar papers
Cooper problem in a cuprate lattice
similarity 0.92Ali Sanayei & Ludwig Mathey · 2021 · arXiv:2110.02734
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frustrated superconductivity and intrinsic reduction of in trilayer nickelate
similarity 0.89Qiong Qin et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.04340
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
What is a Cooper pair ?
similarity 0.89G. Ortiz & J. Dukelsky · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0604236
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper Pairing Revisited
similarity 0.89V. C. Aguilera-Navarro et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312001
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cooper approach to pair formation in a tight-binding model of La-based cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Klaus M. Frahm & Dima L. Shepelyansky · 2022 · arXiv:2209.09057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stable non-Fermi liquid fixed point at the onset of incommensurate charge density wave order
similarity 0.89Ipsita Mandal · 2024 · arXiv:2403.02322
Source status unknown — claims are unverified