Coexisting pseudo-gap and superconducting gap in the high-Tc superconductor La2-xSrxCuO4
T. Yoshida, W. Malaeb, S. Ideta, A. Fujimori, D. H. Lu, R. G. Moor, Z. -X. Shen, M. Okawa, T. Kiss, K. Ishizaka, S. Shin, Seiki Komiya, Yoichi Ando, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida
arXiv:1208.2903 · 2012-08-14
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Relationship between the superconducting gap and the pseudogap has been the subject of controversies. In order to clarify this issue, we have studied the superconducting gap and pseudogap of the high-Tc superconductor La2-xSrxCuO4 (x=0.10, 0.14) by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Through the analysis of the ARPES spectra above and below Tc, we have identified a superconducting coherence peak even in the anti-nodal region on top of the pseudogap of a larger energy scale. The superconducting peak energy nearly follows the pure d-wave form. The d-wave order parameter Δ_0 [defined by Δ(k)=Δ_0(cos(kxa)-cos(kya)) ] for x=0.10 and 0.14 are nearly the same, Δ_0 ~ 12-14 meV, leading to strong coupling 2Δ_0/kB Tc ~ 10. The present result indicates that the pseudogap and the superconducting gap are distinct phenomena and can be described by the "two-gap" scenario.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.86Sr0.14CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.86Sr0.14CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Coexistence of a pseudogap and a superconducting gap for the high−Tc superconductor La2−xSrxCuO4 studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.94T. Yoshida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi surface, pseudogaps and dynamical stripes in La2-xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.93A. Fujimori et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011293
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinct doping dependences of the pseudogap and superconducting gap of La2−xSrxCuO4 cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.93M. Hashimoto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal versus Material-Dependent Two-Gap Behaviors of the High-Tc Cuprate Superconductors: Angle-Resolved Photoemission Study of La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.93T. Yoshida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
d-wave anisotropy and coexistence of the superconducting gap and pseudogap in La2−xSrxCuO4/Ag junctions
similarity 0.92T. Miyake et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal versus Material-Dependent Two-Gap Behaviors in the High-Tc Cuprates: Angle-Resolved Photoemission Study of La2-xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.92T. Yoshida et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.0155
Source status unknown — claims are unverified