Charge compensation and optimal stoichiometry in superconducting (Ca$_x$La$_{1-x}$)(Ba$_{1.75-x}$La$_{0.25+x}$)Cu$_3$O$_y$
Dale R. Harshman, Anthony T. Fiory
arXiv:1211.1298 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.144533 · 2012-11-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The superconductive and magnetic properties of charge$-$compensated (Ca$_x$La$_{1-x}$)(Ba$_{1.75-x}$La$_{0.25+x}$)Cu$_3$O$_y$ (normally denoted as CLBLCO) are considered through quantitative examination of data for electrical resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, transition width, muon$-$spin rotation, x$-$ray absorption, and crystal structure. A derivative of LaBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_y$, cation doping of this unique tetragonal cuprate is constrained by compensating La substitution for Ba with Ca substitution for La, where for 0 {\le} x {\le} 0.5 local maxima in T$_C$ occur for y near 7.15. It is shown that optimum superconductivity occurs for 0.4 {\le} x {\le} 0.5, that the superconductivity and magnetism observed are nonsymbiotic phenomena, and that charge$-$compensated doping leaves the carrier density in the cuprate planes nearly invariant with x, implying that only a small fraction of superconducting condensate resides therein. Applying a model of electronic interactions between physically separated charges in adjacent layers, the mean in-plane spacing between interacting charges, {\ell} = 7.1206 Å, and the distance between interacting layers, ζ = 2.1297 Å, are determined for x = 0.45. The theoretical optimal T$_{C0}$ {\propto} {\ell}$^{-1}$ζ$^{-1}$ of 82.3 K is in excellent agreement with experiment ({\approx} 80.5 K), bringing the number of compounds for which T$_{C0}$ is accurately predicted to 37 from six different superconductor families (overall accuracy of {\pm}1.35 K).
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (CaxLa1-x)(Ba1.75-xLa0.25+x)Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (CaxLa1-x)(Ba1.75-xLa0.25+x)Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 82.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Charge compensation and optimal stoichiometry in superconducting (CaxLa1−x)(Ba1.75−xLa0.25+x)Cu3Oy
similarity 0.94Dale R. Harshman & Anthony T. Fiory
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of magnetic mechanism for cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.88Amit Keren · 2009 · arXiv:0909.1040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous behavior of Tc and pseudogap in the superconductor CaxLa1−xBa1.75−xLa0.25+xCu3Oy with respect to doping and ion size
similarity 0.87J. L. Tallon
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of bond lengths in the 90-K superconductor: A neutron powder-diffraction study of YBa2Cu3−xCoxO7−y
similarity 0.87P. F. Miceli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlation of the Superconducting Critical Temperature with Spin and Orbital Excitation Energies In (Ca{x}La{1-x})(Ba{1.75-x}La{0.25+x})Cu{3}O{y} as Measured by Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering
similarity 0.87David Shai Ellis et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.02021
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and crystal chemistry of TlBa2CuO5 and related cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.86L. F. Mattheiss
Source status unknown — claims are unverified