1/f noise: implications for solid-state quantum information
E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, B. L. Altshuler
arXiv:1304.7925 · DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.361 · 2013-04-30 · Reviews of Modern Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The efficiency of the future devices for quantum information processing will be limited mostly by the finite decoherence rates of the individual qubits and quantum gates. Recently, substantial progress was achieved in enhancing the time within which a solid-state qubit demonstrates coherent dynamics. This progress is based mostly on a successful isolation of the qubits from external decoherence sources obtained by clever engineering. Under these conditions, the material-inherent sources of noise start to play a crucial role. In most cases, quantum devices are affected by noise decreasing with frequency, f, approximately as 1/f. According to the present point of view, such noise is due to material- and device-specific microscopic degrees of freedom interacting with quantum variables of the nanodevice. The simplest picture is that the environment that destroys the phase coherence of the device can be thought of as a system of two-state fluctuators, which experience random hops between their states. If the hopping times are distributed in a exponentially broad domain, the resulting fluctuations have a spectrum close to 1/f in a large frequency range. In this paper we review the current state of the theory of decoherence due to degrees of freedom producing 1/f noise. We discuss basic mechanisms of such noises in various nanodevices and then review several models describing the interaction of the noise sources with quantum devices. The main focus of the review is to analyze how the 1/f noise destroys their coherent operation. We start from individual qubits concentrating mostly on the devices based on superconductor circuits, and then discuss some special issues related to more complicated architectures. Finally, we consider several strategies for minimizing the noise-induced decoherence.
Similar papers
Temperature square dependence of the low frequency 1/f charge noise in the Josephson junction qubits
similarity 0.91O. Astafiev et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0604116
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature Square Dependence of the Low Frequency 1/f Charge Noise in the Josephson Junction Qubits
similarity 0.91O. Astafiev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization of Metal-Induced Gap States at the Metal-Insulator Interface:Origin of Flux Noise in SQUIDs and Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.91SangKook Choi et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.3904
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic flux noise in superconducting qubits and the gap states continuum
similarity 0.89Dominik Szczȩśniak & Sabre Kais · 2020 · arXiv:2003.04885
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interband transitions and interference effects in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89Antti Paila et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0901.1304
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-Gaussian dephasing in flux qubits due to 1/f-noise
similarity 0.88Y. M. Galperin et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified