Evolution of the Superconductivity Dome in the two dimensional Hubbard Model
Kuang-Shing Chen, Zi Yang Meng, Shu-Xiang Yang, Thomas Pruschke, Juana Moreno, Mark Jarrell
arXiv:1308.5946 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245110 · 2013-08-27 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a recent publication [Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, 165136 (2012)], we identified a line of Lifshitz transition points separating the Fermi liquid and pseudogap regions in the hole-doped two dimensional Hubbard model. Here we extend the study to further determine the superconducting transition temperature in the phase diagram. By means of large-scale dynamical cluster quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we are able to identify the evolution of the d-wave superconducting dome in the hole-dope side of the phase diagram, with next-nearest-neighbor hopping (t'), chemical potential and temperature as control parameters. To obtain the superconducting transition temperature Tc, we employ two-particle measurements of the pairing susceptibilities. As t' goes from positive to negative values, we find the d-wave projected irreducible pairing vertex function is enhanced, and the curvature of its doping dependence changes from convex to concave, which fixes the position of the maximum superconducting temperature at the same filling (n close to 0.85) and constraints the dome from precisely following the Lifshitz line. We furthermore decompose the irreducible vertex function into fully irreducible, charge and spin components via the parquet equations, and consistently find that the spin component dominates the pairing vertex function in the doping range where the dome is located. Our investigations deepen the understanding of the phase diagram of the two dimensional Hubbard model.
Similar papers
Proximity of the Superconducting Dome and the Quantum Critical Point in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model
similarity 0.93S.-X. Yang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripe and superconducting order competing in the Hubbard model on a square lattice studied by a combined variational Monte Carlo and tensor network method
similarity 0.92Andrew S. Darmawan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An Exactly Solvable Model of Phase-Fluctuating Superconductivity in Cuprates: The Role of Partially Flat Bands
similarity 0.92Y. Shi et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.05761
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous superconductivity and its competition with antiferromagnetism in doped Mott insulators
similarity 0.92S. S. Kancharla et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity of the Superconducting Dome and the Quantum Critical Point in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model
similarity 0.91Shu-Xiang Yang et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.6050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin of high-Tc superconductivity in doped Hubbard models and their extensions: Roles of uniform charge fluctuations
similarity 0.91Takahiro Misawa & Masatoshi Imada
Source status unknown — claims are unverified