Doping dependence of fluctuation diamagnetism in High Tc superconductors
Kingshuk Sarkar, Sumilan Banerjee, Subroto Mukerjee, T. V. Ramakrishnan
arXiv:1309.3776 · DOI 10.1016/j.aop.2015.11.003 · 2013-09-15 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using a recently proposed Ginzburg-Landau-like lattice free energy functional due to Banerjee et al. Phys. Rev. B 83, 024510 (2011) we calculate the fluctuation diamagnetism of high-Tc superconductors as a function of doping, magnetic field and temperature. We analyse the pairing fluctuations above the superconducting transition temperature in the cuprates, ranging from the strong phase fluctuation dominated underdoped limit to the more conventional amplitude fluctuation dominated overdoped regime. We show that a model where the pairing scale increases and the superfluid density decreases with underdoping produces features of the observed magnetization in the pseudogap region, in good qualitative and reasonable quantitative agreement with the experimental data. In particular, we explicitly show that even when the pseudogap has a pairing origin the magnetization actually tracks the superconducting dome instead of the pseudogap temperature, as seen in experiment. We discuss the doping dependence of the `onset' temperature for fluctuation diamagnetism and comment on the role of vortex core-energy in our model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 45 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 71 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 42 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (La,Eu)2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Cuprate diamagnetism in the presence of a pseudogap: Beyond the standard fluctuation formalism
similarity 0.91Rufus Boyack et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The correlation between the Nernst effect and fluctuation diamagnetism in strongly fluctuating superconductors
similarity 0.91Kingshuk Sarkar et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1701.08091
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Feedback of superconducting fluctuations on charge order in the underdoped cuprates
similarity 0.91Debanjan Chowdhury & Subir Sachdev · 2014 · arXiv:1404.6532
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Fluctuations, Pseudogap and Phase Diagram in Cuprates
similarity 0.91H. Alloul et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1006.3165
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between pair density waves and random field disorders in the pseudogap regime of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Cheung Chan · 2015 · arXiv:1509.07297
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hidden Order in the Cuprates
similarity 0.90S. Chakravarty et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0005443
Source status unknown — claims are unverified