The magnetic and structural properties near the Lifshitz point in Fe1+xTe
E. E. Rodriguez, D. A. Sokolov, C. Stock, M. A. Green, O. Sobolev, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, H. Cao, A. Daoud-Aladine
arXiv:1309.6310 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.165110 · 2013-09-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We construct a phase diagram of the parent compound Fe1+xTe as a function of interstitial iron x in terms of the electronic, structural, and magnetic properties. For a concentration of x < 10%, Fe1+xTe undergoes a "semimetal" to metal transition at approximately 70 K that is also first-order and coincident with a structural transition from a tetragonal to a monoclinic unit cell. For x ~ 14%, Fe1+xTe undergoes a second-order phase transition at approximately 58 K corresponding to a "semimetal" to "semimetal" transition along with a structural orthorhombic distortion. At a critical concentration of x ~ 11%, Fe1+xTe undergoes two transitions: the higher temperature one is a second-order transition to an orthorhombic phase with incommensurate magnetic ordering and temperature-dependent propagation vector, while the lower temperature one corresponds to nucleation of a monoclinic phase with a nearly commensurate magnetic wavevector. While both structural and magnetic transitions display similar critical behavior for x < 10% and near the critical concentration of x ~ 11%, samples with large interstitial iron concentrations show a marked deviation between the critical response indicating a decoupling of the order parameters. Analysis of temperature dependent inelastic neutron data reveals incommensurate magnetic fluctuations throughout the Fe1+xTe phase diagram are directly connected to the "semiconductor"-like resistivity above T_N and implicates scattering from spin fluctuations as the primary reason for the semiconducting or poor metallic properties. The results suggest that doping driven Fermi surface nesting maybe the origin of the gapless and incommensurate spin response at large interstitial concentrations.
Similar papers
From antiferromagnetism to superconductivity in Fe 1+y(Te1-x,Sex) (0 < x < 0.20): a neutron powder diffraction analysis
similarity 0.90A. Martinelli et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.3517
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Importance of Fermi surface and magnetic interactions for the superconducting dome in electron doped FeSe intercalates
similarity 0.90Makoto Shimizu et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.06215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From antiferromagnetism to superconductivity in Fe1+yTe1−xSex (0≤x≤0.20): Neutron powder diffraction analysis
similarity 0.89A. Martinelli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of interstitial Fe to the phase diagram of FeTeSe single crystals
similarity 0.88Yue Sun et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1609.00105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic surface reconstruction in the van-der-Waals antiferromagnet FeTe
similarity 0.88C. Trainer et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.00569
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competing spin density wave, collinear, and helical magnetism in Fe1+xTe
similarity 0.88C. Stock et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.01111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified