Importance of Fermi surface and magnetic interactions for the superconducting dome in electron doped FeSe intercalates
Makoto Shimizu, Nayuta Takemori, Daniel Guterding, Harald O. Jeschke
arXiv:2005.06215 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.180511 · 2020-05-13 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The van-der-Waals gap of iron chalcogenide superconductors can be intercalated with a variety of inorganic and organic compounds that modify the electron doping level of the iron layers. In Lix(C3N2H10)0.37FeSe, a dome in the superconducting transition temperature Tc has been reported to occur in the doping range of x=0.06 to x=0.68. We use a combination of density functional theory and spin fluctuation theory to capture the evolution of superconducting transition temperatures theoretically. We clearly demonstrate how the changing electronic structure supports an increasing superconducting Tc. The suppression of Tc at high doping levels can, however, only be understood by analyzing the magnetic tendencies, which evolve from stripe-type at low doping to bicollinear at high doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lix(C3N2H10)0.37FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 36.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
What controls the superconducting dome of electron-doped FeSe?
similarity 0.91Paul T. Malinowski et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.31459
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin excitations and the Fermi surface of superconducting FeS
similarity 0.91Haoran Man et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.02712
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution from incoherent to coherent electronic states and its implications to superconductivity in FeTe1-xSex
similarity 0.90E. Ieki et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1405.1172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quenched nematic criticality separating two superconducting domes in an iron-based superconductor under pressure
similarity 0.90P. Reiss et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1902.11276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ab-initio perspective on structural and electronic properties of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Daniel Guterding et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.04411
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unified picture of the doping dependence of superconducting transition temperatures in alkali metal/ammonia intercalated FeSe
similarity 0.89Daniel Guterding et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1410.7565
Source status unknown — claims are unverified