← Back to search

The Strain Derivatives of $T_c$ in HgBa$_2$CuO$_{4+δ}$: CuO$_2$ Plane Alone is Not Enough

Shibing Wang, Jianbo Zhang, Jinyuan Yan, Xiao-Jia Chen, Viktor Struzhkin, Wojciech Tabis, Neven Barišic, Mun Chan, Chelsey Dorow, Xudong Zhao, Martin Greven, Wendy L. Mao, Ted Geballe

arXiv:1310.0148 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.024515 · 2013-10-01 · Physical Review B

T1experimental5 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The strain derivatives of $T_c$ along the $a$ and $c$ axes have been determined for HgBa$_2$CuO$_{4+δ}$ (Hg1201), the simplest monolayer cuprate with the highest $T_c$ of all monolayer cuprates ($T_c$ = 97 K at optimal doping). The underdoped compound with the initial $T_c$ of 65 K has been studied as a function of pressure up to 20 GPa by magnetic susceptibility and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The observed linear increase in $T_c$ with pressure is the same as previously been found for the optimally-doped compound. The above results have enabled the investigation of the origins of the significantly different $T_c$ values of optimally doped Hg1201 and the well-studied compound La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ (LSCO), the latter value of $T_c$ = 40 K being only about 40% of the former. Hg1201 can have almost identical CuO$_6$ octahedra as LSCO if specifically strained. When the apical and in-plane CuO$_2$ distances are the same for the two compounds, a large discrepancy in their $T_c$ remains. Differences in crystal structures and interactions involving the Hg-O charge reservoir layers of Hg1201 may be responsible for the different $T_c$ values exhibited by the two compounds.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

97Pressure unresolvedunknown
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

65Pressure unresolvedonset
HgBa2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8417 GPaonset
La2-xSrxCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

40Pressure unresolvedunknown
HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

16430 GPaunknown

Similar papers