Proximity effect between two superconductors spatially resolved by scanning tunneling spectroscopy
V. Cherkez, J. C. Cuevas, C. Brun, T. Cren, G. Menard, F. Debontridder, V. Stolyarov, D. Roditchev
arXiv:1401.8118 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011033 · 2014-01-31 · Physical Review X
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a combined experimental and theoretical study of the proximity effect in an atomic-scale controlled junction between two different superconductors. Elaborated on a Si(111) surface, the junction comprises a Pb nanocrystal with an energy gap of 1.2 meV, connected to a crystalline atomic monolayer of lead with a gap of 0.23 meV. Using in situ scanning tunneling spectroscopy we probe the local density of states of this hybrid system both in space and in energy, at temperatures below and above the critical temperature of the superconducting monolayer. Direct and inverse proximity effects are revealed with high resolution. Our observations are precisely explained with the help of a self-consistent solution of the Usadel equations. In particular, our results demonstrate that in the vicinity of the Pb islands, the Pb monolayer locally develops a finite proximity-induced superconducting order parameter, well above its own bulk critical temperature. This leads to a giant proximity effect where the superconducting correlations penetrate inside the monolayer a distance much larger than in a non-superconducting metal.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.89 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.51 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Proximity Effect between Two Superconductors Spatially Resolved by Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
similarity 0.95V. Cherkez et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in normal-metal quasiparticle traps
similarity 0.90A. Hosseinkhani & G. Catelani · 2017 · arXiv:1712.05235
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field-dependent nonlinear surface resistance and its optimization by surface nano-structuring in superconductors
similarity 0.90Takayuki Kubo & Alex Gurevich · 2019 · arXiv:1907.12040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Induced superconducting pair correlations in a quasicrystal coupled to a BCS superconductor
similarity 0.90Gautam Rai et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.01540
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling Tunneling for the Unconventional Superconducting Proximity Effect
similarity 0.90Parisa Zareapour et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.01520
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thouless energy in Josephson SN-N-NS bridges
similarity 0.89S. V. Bakurskiy et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.01717
Source status unknown — claims are unverified