← Back to search

Is the anisotropy of the upper critical field of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ consistent with a helical $p$-wave state?

JIngchuan Zhang, Christopher Lörscher, Qiang Gu, Richard A. Klemm

arXiv:1403.4715 · DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/26/25/252201 · 2014-03-19 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

T1experimental11 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We calculate the angular and temperature $T$ dependencies of the upper critical field $H_{c2}(θ,φ,T)$ for the $C_{4v}$ point group helical $p$-wave states, assuming a single uniaxial ellipsoidal Fermi surface, Pauli limiting, and strong spin-orbit coupling that locks the spin-triplet $\vec{\bf d}$-vectors onto the layers. Good fits to the Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ $H_{c2,a}(θ,T)$ data of Kittaka {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 80}, 174514 (2009)] are obtained. Helical states with $\vec{\bf d}(\vec{\bf k})=k_x\vec{\bf x}-k_y\vec{\bf y}$ and $k_y\vec{\bf x}+k_x\vec{\bf y}$ (or $k_x\vec{\bf x}+k_y\vec{\bf y}$ and $k_y\vec{\bf x}-k_x\vec{\bf y}$) produce $H_{c2}(90^{\circ},φ,T)$ that greatly exceed (or do not exhibit) the four-fold azimuthal anisotropy magnitudes observed in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ by Kittaka {\it et al.} and by Mao {\it et al.} [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 991 (2000)], respectively.

Similar papers