Distribution of electrons and holes in cuprate superconductors as determined from $^{17}$O and $^{63}$Cu nuclear magnetic resonance
Michael Jurkutat, Damian Rybicki, Oleg P. Sushkov, Grant V. M. Williams, Andreas Erb, Jürgen Haase
arXiv:1403.6289 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.140504 · 2014-03-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The distribution of electrons and holes in the CuO$_2$ plane of the high-temperature superconducting cuprates is determined with nuclear magnetic resonance through the quadrupole splittings of $^{17}$O and $^{63}$Cu. Based on new data for single crystals of electron-doped Pr$_{2-x}$Ce$_x$CuO$_4$(x=0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15) as well as Nd$_{2-x}$Ce$_x$CuO$_4$ (x=0, 0.13) the changes in hole contents $n_d$ of Cu 3d$(x^2-y^2)$ and $n_p$ of O 2$p_σ$ orbitals are determined and they account for the stoichiometrically doped charges, similar to hole-doped \lsco. It emerges that while $n_d+2n_p=1$ in all parent materials as expected, $n_d$ and $n_p$ vary substantially between different groups of materials. Doping holes increases predominantly $n_p$, but also $n_d$. To the contrary, doping electrons predominantly decreases $n_d$ and only slightly $n_p$. However, $n_p$ for the electron doped systems is higher than that in hole doped La$_{1.85}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$. Cuprates with the highest maximum $T_{\rm c}$s appear to have a comparably low $n_d$ while, at the same time, $n_p$ is very high. The rather high oxygen hole content of the Pr$_2$CuO$_4$ and Nd$_2$CuO$_4$ with the low $n_d$ seems to make them ideal candidates for hole doping to obtain the highest $T_{\rm c}$.
Similar papers
Distribution of electrons and holes in cuprate superconductors as determined from 17O and Cu63 nuclear magnetic resonance
similarity 0.92Michael Jurkutat et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure of the CuO monolayer in the paramagnetic phase considering the Coulomb interactions
similarity 0.89I. A. Makarov et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.21389
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A different NMR view of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Jürgen Haase · 2022 · arXiv:2201.12882
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of magnetic mechanism for cuprate superconductivity
similarity 0.89Amit Keren · 2009 · arXiv:0909.1040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel Superconducting Phases in Copper Oxides and Iron-oxypnictides: NMR Studies
similarity 0.89Yoshio Kitaoka et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1101.3928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ambipolar doping of a charge-transfer insulator in the Emery model
similarity 0.89G. Sordi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.19545
Source status unknown — claims are unverified