Measuring the superconducting coherence length in thin films using a two-coil experiment
John Draskovic, Thomas R. Lemberger, Brian Peters, Fengyuan Yang, Jaseung Ku, Alexey Bezryadin, Song Wang
arXiv:1403.6856 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.88.134516 · 2014-03-26 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present measurements of the superconducting coherence length ξ in thin (d < 100 Å) films of MoGe alloy and Nb using a combination of linear and nonlinear mutual inductance techniques. As the alternating current in the drive coil is increased at fixed temperature, we see a crossover from linear to nonlinear coupling to the pickup coil, consistent with the unbinding of vortex-antivortex pairs as the peak pair momentum nears \hbar\/ξ and the unbinding barrier vanishes. We compare measurements of ξ made by this mutual inductance technique to values determined from the films' upper critical fields, thereby confirming the applicability of a recent calculation of the upper limit on a vortex-free state in our experiment.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.6 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.55 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.9 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.6 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.55 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.3 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| MoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.46 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.6 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.22 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.5 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.45 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.4 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NbTi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Measuring the superconducting coherence length in thin films using a two-coil experiment
similarity 0.92John Draskovic et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Upper critical field and superconductor-metal transition in ultrathin niobium films
similarity 0.88I. Zaytseva et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.03080
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field dependence of the vortex-core size in dirty two-band superconductors
similarity 0.88A. Vargunin & M. A. Silaev
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Diamond Magnetometry of Superconducting Thin Films
similarity 0.87A. Waxman et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2689
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tuning the interlayer spacing in high T_c superconductors: penetration depth and two-dimensional superfluid density
similarity 0.87P. J. Baker et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.0561
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless vortex unbinding transition in two-dimensional superconductors using local noise magnetometry
similarity 0.87Jonathan B. Curtis et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.06147
Source status unknown — claims are unverified