Energy of magnetic moment of superconducting current in magnetic field
V. L. Gurtovoi, A. V. Nikulov
arXiv:1501.00468 · DOI 10.1016/J.PHYSC.2015.06.012 · 2014-12-22 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The energy of magnetic moment of the persistent current circulating in superconducting loop in an externally produced magnetic field is not taken into account in the theory of quantization effects because of identification of the Hamiltonian with the energy. This identification misleads if, in accordance with the conservation law, the energy of a state is the energy expended for its creation. The energy of magnetic moment is deduced from a creation history of the current state in magnetic field both in the classical and quantum case. But taking this energy into account demolishes the agreement between theory and experiment. Impartial consideration of this problem discovers the contradiction both in theory and experiment.
Similar papers
Dynamic processes in superconductors and the laws of thermodynamics
similarity 0.90A. V. Nikulov · 2021 · arXiv:2110.00386
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Meissner effect puzzle and the quantum force in superconductor
similarity 0.89A. V. Nikulov · 2012 · arXiv:1211.0002
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On a recent explanation of the dynamics of the Meissner effect within the conventional theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2026 · arXiv:2512.16938
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Lorentz force and superconductivity
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305542
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The origin of the Meissner effect in new and old superconductors
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch · 2011 · arXiv:1201.0139
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow
similarity 0.88A. V. Nikulov · 2026 · arXiv:2605.10945
Source status unknown — claims are unverified