Comment on arXiv:1301.3829 and Reply to 'Comment on "Can disorder really enhance superconductivity?"' arXiv:1501.05148 by I.M. Suslov

James Mayoh; Antonio M. Garcia-Garcia

← Back to search

Comment on arXiv:1301.3829 and Reply to 'Comment on "Can disorder really enhance superconductivity?"' arXiv:1501.05148 by I.M. Suslov

James Mayoh, Antonio M. Garcia-Garcia

arXiv:1502.06282 · 2015-02-22 · arXiv: Superconductivity

T31 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In arXiv:1301.3829 and arXiv:1501.05148 I. M. Suslov proposes a theoretical description for the interplay between disorder and superconductivity that, among other things, claims to predict situations where superconductivity is enhanced by disorder. In this comment we show that Suslov's results do not make any sound predictions relating to this problem. Suslov also suggests that the percolation approach recently employed by the authors to compute the global critical temperature of inhomogeneous superconductors induced by weak multifractality is not satisfactory. We refute Suslov's opinion using simple ideas from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schiaffer (BCS) theory of superconductivity. More importantly we stress that our theory makes quantitative analytical predictions for observables such as the global critical temperature and the spatial distribution of the order parameter. Our work can therefore be easily confirmed or disproved through either numerical or experimental study.