Superconducting phase diagram of itinerant antiferromagnets
A. T. Roemer, I. Eremin, P. J. Hirschfeld, B. M. Andersen
arXiv:1505.03003 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174519 · 2015-05-12 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the phase diagram of the Hubbard model in the weak-coupling limit for coexisting spin-density-wave order and spin-fluctuation-mediated superconductivity. Both longitudinal and transverse spin fluctuations contribute significantly to the effective interaction potential, which creates Cooper pairs of the quasi-particles of the antiferromagnetic metallic state. We find a dominant $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave solution in both electron- and hole-doped cases. In the quasi-spin triplet channel, the longitudinal fluctuations give rise to an effective attraction supporting a $p$-wave gap, but are overcome by repulsive contributions from the transverse fluctuations which disfavor $p$-wave pairing compared to $d_{x^2-y^2}$. The sub-leading pair instability is found to be in the $g$-wave channel, but complex admixtures of $d$ and $g$ are not energetically favored since their nodal structures coincide. Inclusion of interband pairing, in which each fermion in the Cooper pair belongs to a different spin-density-wave band, is considered for a range of electron dopings in the regime of well-developed magnetic order. We demonstrate that these interband pairing gaps, which are non-zero in the magnetic state, must have the same parity under inversion as the normal intraband gaps. The self-consistent solution to the full system of five coupled gap equations give intraband and interband pairing gaps of $d_{x^2-y^2}$ structure and similar gap magnitude. In conclusion, the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ gap dominates for both hole and electron doping inside the spin-density-wave phase.
Similar papers
Superconducting phase diagram of itinerant antiferromagnets
similarity 0.93A. T. Rømer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping asymmetry of superconductivity coexisting with antiferromagnetism in spin fluctuation theory
similarity 0.92W. Rowe et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1312.1507
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Constraints on superconducting pairing in altermagnets
similarity 0.91Debmalya Chakraborty & Annica M. Black-Schaffer · 2024 · arXiv:2408.03999
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reconciling phase shift in Josephson junction experiments with even-parity superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Austin W. Lindquist & Hae-Young Kee · 2022 · arXiv:2210.00554
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of momentum-dependent quasiparticle renormalization on the gap structure of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Shinibali Bhattacharyya et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.10453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interrelation between antiferromagnetic and superconducting gaps in high-Tc materials
similarity 0.90E. Arrigoni et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105125
Source status unknown — claims are unverified