Superconducting phase diagram of itinerant antiferromagnets
A. T. Rømer, I. Eremin, P. J. Hirschfeld, B. M. Andersen
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174519 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the phase diagram of the Hubbard model in the weak-coupling limit for coexisting spin-density-wave order and spin-fluctuation-mediated superconductivity. Both longitudinal and transverse spin fluctuations contribute significantly to the effective interaction potential, which creates Cooper pairs of the quasiparticles of the antiferromagnetic metallic state. We find a dominant dx2−y2-wave solution in both electron- and hole-doped cases. In the quasi-spin-triplet channel, the longitudinal fluctuations give rise to an effective attraction supporting a p-wave gap, but are overcome by repulsive contributions from the transverse fluctuations which disfavor p-wave pairing compared to dx2−y2. The subleading pair instability is found to be in the g-wave channel, but complex admixtures of d and g are not energetically favored since their nodal structures coincide. Inclusion of interband pairing, in which each fermion in the Cooper pair belongs to a different spin-density-wave band, is considered for a range of electron dopings in the regime of well-developed magnetic order. We demonstrate that these interband pairing gaps, which are nonzero in the magnetic state, must have the same parity under inversion as the normal intraband gaps. The self-consistent solution to the full system of five coupled gap equations gives intraband and interband pairing gaps of dx2−y2 structure and similar gap magnitude. In conclusion, the dx2−y2 gap dominates for both hole and electron doping inside the spin-density-wave phase.
Similar papers
Superconducting phase diagram of itinerant antiferromagnets
similarity 0.93A. T. Roemer et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1505.03003
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting phase diagram of the paramagnetic one-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Andreas Kreisel et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.07119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic fluctuations and d-wave superconductivity in electron-doped high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.90Bumsoo Kyung et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a two-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.90Hideo Aoki & Kazuhiko Kuroki
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and superconducting order parameter phase fluctuations in a weakly doped antiferromagnet
similarity 0.90V. M. Loktev & V. M. Turkowski · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610849
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Phase Transitions in d-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.90Matthias Vojta et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified