The phase diagrams of iron-based superconductors: theory and experiments
A. Martinelli, F. Bernardini, S. Massidda
arXiv:1507.02406 · DOI 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.06.001 · 2015-07-09 · Comptes Rendus Physique
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Phase diagrams play a primary role in the understanding of materials properties. For iron-based superconductors (Fe-SC), the correct definition of their phase diagrams is crucial because of the close interplay between their crystallo-chemical and magnetic properties, on one side, and the possible coexistence of magnetism and superconductivity, on the other. The two most difficult issues for understanding the Fe-SC phase diagrams are: 1) the origin of the structural transformation taking place during cooling and its relationship with magnetism; 2) the correct description of the region where a crossover between the magnetic and superconducting electronic ground states takes place. Hence a proper and accurate definition of the structural, magnetic and electronic phase boundaries provides an extremely powerful tool for material scientists. For this reason, an exact definition of the thermodynamic phase fields characterizing the different structural and physical properties involved is needed, although it is not easy to obtain in many cases. Moreover, physical properties can often be strongly dependent on the occurrence of micro-structural and other local-scale features (lattice micro-strain, chemical fluctuations, domain walls, grain boundaries, defects), which, as a rule, are not described in a structural phase diagram. In this review, we critically summarize the results for the most studied 11-, 122- and 1111-type compound systems, providing a correlation between experimental evidence and theory.
Similar papers
Unveiling Mechanisms of Electric Field Effects on Superconductors by Magnetic Field Response
similarity 0.87Lennart Bours et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.01655
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Short-range symmetry breaking induced structural collapse and Tc enhancement in 122-type iron pnictide superconductors
similarity 0.87X. Q. Huang · 2012 · arXiv:1205.1837
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Fe excess on structural, magnetic and superconducting properties of single-crystalline Fe(1+x)Te(1-y)Se(y)
similarity 0.86R. Viennois et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.2081
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiband character of -FeSe: Angular dependence of the magnetoresistance and upper critical field
similarity 0.86M. L. Amigó et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1411.3664
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Peculiar Phase Diagram with Isolated Superconducting Regions in ThFeAsNO
similarity 0.85Bai-Zhuo Li et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.12276
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Domain Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet
similarity 0.85M. Fauré & A. I. Buzdin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified