Unveiling Mechanisms of Electric Field Effects on Superconductors by Magnetic Field Response
Lennart Bours, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Mario Cuoco, Elia Strambini, Francesco Giazotto
arXiv:2003.01655 · DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVRESEARCH.2.033353 · 2020-03-03 · Physical Review Research
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate that superconducting aluminium nano-bridges can be driven into a state with complete suppression of the critical supercurrent via electrostatic gating. Probing both in- and out-of-plane magnetic field responses in the presence of electrostatic gating can unveil the mechanisms that primarily cause the superconducting electric field effects. Remarkably, we find that a magnetic field, independently of its orientation, has only a weak influence on the critical electric field that identifies the transition from the superconducting state to a phase with vanishing critical supercurrent. This observation points to the absence of a direct coupling between the electric field and the amplitude of the superconducting order parameter or $2π$-phase slips via vortex generation. The magnetic field effect observed in the presence of electrostatic gating is described within a microscopic model where a spatially uniform inter-band $π$-phase is stabilized by the electric field. Such an intrinsic superconducting phase rearrangement can account for the suppression of the supercurrent, as well as for the weak dependence of the critical magnetic fields on the electric field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.507 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electrically Tunable Superconductivity Through Surface Orbital Polarization
similarity 0.92Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.09227
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectroscopic Signatures of Gate-Controlled Superconducting Phases
similarity 0.92Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.01490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of electrostatic fields in layered crystalline BCS superconductors
similarity 0.90Luca Chirolli et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.13911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetotransport Experiments on Fully Metallic Superconducting Dayem-Bridge Field-Effect Transistors
similarity 0.90Federico Paolucci et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of weakly coupled superconducting multilayers in an external magnetic field
similarity 0.89Sergey V. Kuplevakhsky · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9812277
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson transistor from the superconducting diode effect in domain wall and skyrmion magnetic racetracks
similarity 0.89Richard Hess et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.04817
Source status unknown — claims are unverified