Electrically Tunable Superconductivity Through Surface Orbital Polarization
Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Paolo Solinas, Francesco Giazotto, Mario Cuoco
arXiv:1907.09227 · DOI 10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034041 · 2019-07-22 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the physical mechanisms for achieving an electrical control of conventional spin-singlet superconductivity in thin films by focusing on the role of surface orbital polarization. Assuming a multi-orbital description of the metallic state, due to screening effects the electric field acts by modifying the strength of the surface potential and, in turn, yields non-trivial orbital-Rashba couplings. The resulting orbital polarization at the surface and in its close proximity is shown to have a dramatic impact on superconductivity. We demonstrate that, by varying the strength of the electric field, the superconducting phase can be either suppressed, i.e. turned into normal metal, or undergo a $0-π$ transition with the $π$ phase being marked by non-trivial sign change of the superconducting order parameter between different bands. These findings unveil a rich scenario to design heterostructures with superconducting orbitronics effects.
Similar papers
Electrically Tunable Superconductivity Through Surface Orbital Polarization
similarity 0.92Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unveiling Mechanisms of Electric Field Effects on Superconductors by Magnetic Field Response
similarity 0.92Lennart Bours et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.01655
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-Polarization Coupling in Superconductor-Ferroelectric Superlattices
similarity 0.89N. Pavlenko & F. Schwabl · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0309250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectroscopic Signatures of Gate-Controlled Superconducting Phases
similarity 0.89Maria Teresa Mercaldo et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.01490
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reconciling phase shift in Josephson junction experiments with even-parity superconductivity in SrRuO
similarity 0.89Austin W. Lindquist & Hae-Young Kee · 2022 · arXiv:2210.00554
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit coupled superconductivity: Rashba-Hubbard model on the square lattice
similarity 0.88Sebastian Wolf & Stephan Rachel · 2020 · arXiv:2004.12624
Source status unknown — claims are unverified