Reproducible Operating Margins on a 72,800-Device Digital Superconducting Chip
Quentin P. Herr, Joshua Osborne, Micah J. A. Stoutimore, Harold Hearne, Ryan Selig, Jacob Vogel, Eileen Min, Vladimir V. Talanov, Anna Y. Herr
arXiv:1510.01220 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/28/12/124003 · 2015-10-05 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the design and test of Reciprocal Quantum Logic shift-register yield vehicles consisting of up to 72,800 Josephson junction devices per die, the largest digital superconducting circuits ever reported. Multiple physical layout styles were matched to the MIT Lincoln Laboratory foundry, which supports processes with both four and eight metal layers and minimum feature size of 0.5 μm. The largest individual circuits with 40,400 junctions indicate large operating margins of $\pm$20% on AC clock amplitude. In one case the data were reproducible to the accuracy of the measurement, $\pm$1% across five thermal cycles using only the rudimentary precautions of passive mu-metal magnetic shielding and a controlled cool-down rate of 3 mK/s in the test fixture. We conclude that with proper mitigation techniques, flux-trapping is no longer a limiting consideration for very-large-scale-integration of superconductor digital logic.
Similar papers
Characterization of Flux Trapping in and Fabrication of Large-Scale Superconductor Circuits Using AC-Biased Shift Registers With 108500 Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.87Evan B. Golden et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2501.03343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic imaging of superconducting qubit devices with scanning SQUID-on-tip
similarity 0.87E. Marchiori et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.08163
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extraction and Simulation of the Impact of Flux Trapping in Moats of AC-Biased Shift Registers
similarity 0.86Scott E. Meninger & Sergey K. Tolpygo · 2024 · arXiv:2411.02749
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elimination of Flux Trapping in Superconducting Circuits in Ambient Magnetic Fields
similarity 0.86Rohan T. Kapur et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.27415
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of Magnetic Flux Trapping in Superconducting Electronics Using Moats
similarity 0.85Rohan T. Kapur et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.18345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting atom chips: advantages and challenges
similarity 0.85Valery Dikovsky et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.1897
Source status unknown — claims are unverified