Elimination of Flux Trapping in Superconducting Circuits in Ambient Magnetic Fields
Rohan T. Kapur, Alex Wynn, Sergey K. Tolpygo, Neel Parmar, Anil Mankame, Adam A. Libson, Rabindra Das, Michele Kelley, Pauli Kehayias, Nathaniel J. O'Connor, Collin N. Muniz, Justin L. Mallek, Jennifer M. Schloss
arXiv:2606.27415 · 2026-06-25
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductor digital electronics and quantum computing with superconducting qubits are promising next-generation computing technologies. When cooled down or operated in the presence of a nonzero background magnetic field $B_r$, superconducting thin films comprising the circuits can trap magnetic vortices that can degrade circuit or qubit performance. In this work, we report a practical solution for eliminating flux trapped during cooldown in ambient magnetic fields, $B_r\leq 60$ $\upmu$T, based on controlled local thermal gradients and moats, etched holes in the superconducting films of the circuit. Thermal gradients created by integrated on-chip resistive heaters move vortices towards the moats, where they become trapped away from circuitry regions and pinning sites. Using magnetic imaging and electrical circuit readout, we demonstrate that this approach is capable of removing magnetic flux trapped during field cooling and magnetic flux nucleated by circuit operation. If used in an environment with basic magnetic shielding, this solution is capable of suppressing all magnetic flux in a large-scale circuit, overcoming one of the long-standing challenges preventing high-performance scalable computing using superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Reproducible Operating Margins on a 72,800-Device Digital Superconducting Chip
similarity 0.87Quentin P. Herr et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.01220
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of Magnetic Flux Trapping in Superconducting Electronics Using Moats
similarity 0.86Rohan T. Kapur et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2602.18345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantifying Trapped Magnetic Vortex Losses in Niobium Resonators at mK Temperatures
similarity 0.86D. Bafia et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.14616
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic imaging of superconducting qubit devices with scanning SQUID-on-tip
similarity 0.86E. Marchiori et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.08163
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of the Josephson current by an exchange field in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.86F. S. Bergeret et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0102012
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of Flux Trapping in and Fabrication of Large-Scale Superconductor Circuits Using AC-Biased Shift Registers With 108500 Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.85Evan B. Golden et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2501.03343
Source status unknown — claims are unverified