Using Gap Symmetry and Structure to Reveal the Pairing Mechanism in Fe-based Superconductors
P. J. Hirschfeld
arXiv:1510.01386 · DOI 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.10.002 · 2015-10-05 · Comptes Rendus Physique
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
I review theoretical ideas and implications of experiments for the gap structure and symmetry of the Fe-based superconductors. Unlike any other class of unconventional superconductors, one has in these systems the possibility to tune the interactions by small changes in pressure, doping or disorder. Thus, measurements of order parameter evolution with these parameters should enable a deeper understanding of the underlying interactions. I briefly review the "standard paradigm" for $s$-wave pairing in these systems, and then focus on developments in the past several years which have challenged this picture. I discuss the reasons for the apparent close competition between pairing in s- and d-wave channels, particularly in those systems where one type of Fermi surface pocket -- hole or electron -- is missing. Observation of a transition between $s$- and $d$-wave symmetry, possibly via a time reversal symmetry breaking "$s+id$" state, would provide an importantconfirmation of these ideas. Several proposals for detecting these novel phases are discussed, including the appearance of order parameter collective modes in Raman and optical conductivities. Transitions between two different types of $s$-wave states, involving various combinations of signs on Fermi surface pockets, can also proceed through a ${\cal T}$-breaking "$s+is$" state. I discuss recent work that suggests pairing may take place away from the Fermi level over a surprisingly large energy range, as well as the effect of glide plane symmetry of the Fe-based systems on the superconductivity, including various exotic, time and translational invariance breaking pair states that have been proposed. Finally, I address disorder issues, and the various ways systematic introduction of disorder can (and cannot) be used to extract information on gap symmetry and structure.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFe2Se2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 40 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Strong Interplay between Stripe Spin Fluctuations, Nematicity and Superconductivity in FeSe
similarity 0.94Wang, Qisi et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1502.07544
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SR study of time-reversal symmetry constraints and bulk superfluid response in LiFeAs
similarity 0.93Rustem Khasanov et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.14376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Detecting sign-changing superconducting gap in LiFeAs using quasiparticle interference
similarity 0.93D. Altenfeld et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1712.03625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe
similarity 0.93M. D. Watson et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.02917
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magneto-elasto-resistivity in FeSe
similarity 0.93M. Wissmann et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.16796
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synthesis, phase stability, structural and physical properties of 11-type iron chalcogenides
similarity 0.93Sahana Rößler et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.01012
Source status unknown — claims are unverified