Hard gap in a normal layer coupled to a superconductor
Reeg, Christopher R., Maslov, Dmitrii L.
arXiv:1603.03354 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.020501 · 2016-07-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The ability to induce a sizable gap in the excitation spectrum of a normal layer placed in contact with a conventional superconductor has become increasingly important in recent years in the context of engineering a topological superconductor. The quasiclassical theory of the proximity effect shows that Andreev reflection at the superconductor/normal interface induces a nonzero pairing amplitude in the metal but does not endow it with a gap. Conversely, when the normal layer is atomically thin, the tunneling of Cooper pairs induces an excitation gap that can be as large as the bulk gap of the superconductor. We study how these two seemingly different views of the proximity effect evolve into one another as the thickness of the normal layer is changed. We show that a fully quantum-mechanical treatment of the problem predicts that the induced gap is always finite but falls off with the thickness of the normal layer, $d$. If $d$ is less than a certain crossover scale, which is much larger than the Fermi wavelength, the induced gap is comparable to the bulk gap. As a result, a sizable excitation gap can be induced in normal layers that are much thicker than the Fermi wavelength.
Similar papers
Hard gap in a normal layer coupled to a superconductor
similarity 0.92Christopher R. Reeg & Dmitrii L. Maslov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous supercurrent modulated by interfacial magnetizations in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers
similarity 0.89Hao Meng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.12718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in a two-dimensional electron gas coupled to a thin superconducting layer
similarity 0.89Christopher Reeg et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.08337
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic simulation of superconductor-topological insulator proximity structures
similarity 0.89Mahmoud Lababidi & Erhai Zhao · 2011 · arXiv:1101.2904
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity-induced low-energy renormalization in hybrid semiconductor-superconductor Majorana structures
similarity 0.88Tudor D. Stanescu & Sankar Das Sarma · 2017 · arXiv:1702.03976
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Going beyond the Chandrasekhar-Clogston limit in a flat-band superconductor
similarity 0.88Atousa Ghanbari et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.13245
Source status unknown — claims are unverified