Hard gap in a normal layer coupled to a superconductor
Christopher R. Reeg, Dmitrii L. Maslov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.020501 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The ability to induce a sizable gap in the excitation spectrum of a normal layer placed in contact with a conventional superconductor has become increasingly important in recent years in the context of engineering a topological superconductor. The quasiclassical theory of the proximity effect shows that Andreev reflection at the superconductor/normal interface induces a nonzero pairing amplitude in the metal but does not endow it with a gap. Conversely, when the normal layer is atomically thin, the tunneling of Cooper pairs induces an excitation gap that can be as large as the bulk gap of the superconductor. We study how these two seemingly different views of the proximity effect evolve into one another as the thickness of the normal layer is changed. We show that a fully quantum-mechanical treatment of the problem predicts that the induced gap is always finite but falls off with the thickness of the normal layer d. If d is less than a certain crossover scale, which is much larger than the Fermi wavelength, the induced gap is comparable to the bulk gap. As a result, a sizable excitation gap can be induced in normal layers that are much thicker than the Fermi wavelength.
Similar papers
Hard gap in a normal layer coupled to a superconductor
similarity 0.94Reeg, Christopher R. & Maslov, Dmitrii L. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.03354
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometrical enhancement of the proximity effect in quantum wires with extended superconducting tunnel contacts
similarity 0.91Giorgos Fagas et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in clean ferromagnetic layers
similarity 0.90M. Zareyan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Visualizing landscapes of the superconducting gap in heterogeneous superconductor thin films: geometric influences on proximity effects
similarity 0.90Jungdae Kim et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.0354
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect at the superconductor–topological insulator interface
similarity 0.90Tudor D. Stanescu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect in normal metal–multiband superconductor hybrid structures
similarity 0.90A. Brinkman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified