← Back to search

High-Tc Superconducting Quantum Interference Filters (SQIFs) made by ion irradiation

S. Ouanani, J. Kermorvant, C. Ulysse, M. Malnou, Y. Lemaître, B. Marcilhac, C. Feuillet-Palma, N. Bergeal, D. Crété, J. Lesueur

arXiv:1603.07592 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/29/9/094002 · 2016-03-24 · Superconductor Science and Technology

T1theoretical27 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Superconducting Quantum Interference Filters (SQIFs) are arrays of superconducting loops of different sizes including Josephson Junctions (JJ). For a random distribution of sizes, they present a non-periodic response to an applied magnetic field, with an extended linear regime and a sizable field sensitivity. Such properties make SQIFs interesting devices to detect the magnetic component of electromagnetic waves at microwave frequencies. We have used the highly scalable technique of ion irradiation to make High Tc SQUIDs and SQIFs based on commercial YBa2Cu3O7 films, and studied their properties. Both display optimum performances as a function of temperature and bias current, that can be understood in the frame of numerical simulations that we developed. The role of asymmetries and spread in JJ characteristics (routinely found in HTSc technologies) is described : ion irradiation based devices appear robust against them. We finally present results on SQIF made with 2000 SQUID in series, showing a transfer function dV/dB ~ 1000V/T .

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

88Pressure not reportedonset
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

73Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers