Pairing Mechanism of the Heavily Electron Doped FeSe Systems: Dynamical Tuning of the Pairing Cutoff Energy
Yunkyu Bang
arXiv:1605.01509 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113054 · 2016-05-05 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We studied pairing mechanism of the heavily electron doped FeSe (HEDIS) systems, which commonly have one incipient hole band -- a band top below the Fermi level by a finite energy distance $ε_b$ -- at $Γ$ point and ordinary electron bands at $M$ points in Brillouin zone (BZ). We found that the system allows two degenerate superconducting solutions with the exactly same $T_c$ in clean limit: the incipient $s^{\pm}_{he}$-gap ($Δ_h^{-} \neq 0$, $Δ_e^{+} \neq 0$) and $s_{ee}^{++}$-gap ($Δ_h =0$, $Δ_e^{+} \neq 0$) solutions with different pairing cutoffs, $Λ_{sf}$ (spin fluctuation energy) and $ε_b$, respectively. The $s_{ee}^{++}$-gap solution, in which the system dynamically renormalizes the original pairing cutoff $Λ_{sf}$ to $Λ_{phys}=ε_b$ ($< Λ_{sf}$), therefore actively eliminates the incipient hole band from forming Cooper pairs, but without loss of $T_c$, becomes immune to the impurity pair-breaking. As a result, the HEDIS systems, by dynamically tuning the pairing cutoff and selecting the $s_{ee}^{++}$-pairing state, can always achieve the maximum $T_c$ -- the $T_c$ of the degenerate $s^{\pm}_{he}$ solution in the ideal clean limit -- latent in the original pairing interactions, even in dirty limit.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Argument on superconductivity pairing mechanism from cobalt impurity doping in FeSe: spin () or orbital () fluctuation
similarity 0.89T. Urata et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.04605
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity suppression of the critical temperature in the iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Yunkyu Bang et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.3473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Tc via spin fluctuations from incipient bands: application to monolayers and intercalates of FeSe
similarity 0.88A. Linscheid et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1603.03739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamics of transition to BCS-BEC crossover superconductivity in FeSeS
similarity 0.88Y. Mizukami et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.00739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Eliashberg theory for spin-fluctuations mediated superconductivity -- Application to bulk and monolayer FeSe
similarity 0.87Fabian Schrodi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2004.01539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous scaling of the specific-heat jump vs. in the Fe-based superconductors: the S-wave pairing state model
similarity 0.87Yunkyu Bang & G. R. Stewart · 2014 · arXiv:1410.1244
Source status unknown — claims are unverified