Superconducting qubit in a nonstationary transmission line cavity: parametric excitation, periodic pumping, and energy dissipation
A. A. Zhukov, D. S. Shapiro, S. V. Remizov, W. V. Pogosov, Yu. E. Lozovik
arXiv:1607.03054 · DOI 10.1016/j.physleta.2016.12.033 · 2016-07-11 · Physics Letters A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider a superconducting qubit coupled to the nonstationary transmission line cavity with modulated frequency taking into account energy dissipation. Previously, it was demonstrated that in the case of a single nonadiabatical modulation of a cavity frequency there are two channels of a two-level system excitation which are due to the absorption of Casimir photons and due to the counterrotating wave processes responsible for the dynamical Lamb effect. We show that the parametric periodical modulation of the resonator frequency can increase dramatically the excitation probability. Remarkably, counterrotating wave processes under such a modulation start to play an important role even in the resonant regime. Our predictions can be used to control qubit-resonator quantum states as well as to study experimentally different channels of a parametric qubit excitation.
Similar papers
Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction
similarity 0.89P. Forn-Díaz et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.09275
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Qubit-oscillator system: An analytical treatment of the ultra-strong coupling regime
similarity 0.89Johannes Hausinger & Milena Grifoni · 2010 · arXiv:1007.5437
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cavity QED in superconducting circuits: susceptibility at elevated temperatures
similarity 0.89Ileana Rau et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403257
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical Lamb Effect in a Tunable Superconducting Qubit-Cavity System
similarity 0.89D. S. Shapiro et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1503.01666
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing
similarity 0.88G. Wendin & V. S. Shumeiko · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-resonator circuit QED: Dissipative Theory
similarity 0.88Georg M. Reuther et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.2657
Source status unknown — claims are unverified