Magnetic field dependence of the internal quality factor and noise performance of lumped-element kinetic inductance detectors
Daniel Flanigan, Bradley R. Johnson, Maximilian H. Abitbol, Sean Bryan, Robin Cantor, Peter K. Day, Glenn Jones, Philip Mauskopf, Heather McCarrick, Amber Miller, Jonas Zmuidzinas
arXiv:1609.06352 · DOI 10.1063/1.4964119 · 2016-09-20 · arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a technique for increasing the internal quality factor of kinetic inductance detectors (KIDs) by nulling ambient magnetic fields with a properly applied magnetic field. The KIDs used in this study are made from thin-film aluminum, they are mounted inside a light-tight package made from bulk aluminum, and they are operated near $150 \, \mathrm{mK}$. Since the thin-film aluminum has a slightly elevated critical temperature ($T_\mathrm{c} = 1.4 \, \mathrm{K}$), it therefore transitions before the package ($T_\mathrm{c} = 1.2 \, \mathrm{K}$), which also serves as a magnetic shield. On cooldown, ambient magnetic fields as small as approximately $30 \, \mathrm{μT}$ can produce vortices in the thin-film aluminum as it transitions because the bulk aluminum package has not yet transitioned and therefore is not yet shielding. These vortices become trapped inside the aluminum package below $1.2 \, \mathrm{K}$ and ultimately produce low internal quality factors in the thin-film superconducting resonators. We show that by controlling the strength of the magnetic field present when the thin film transitions, we can control the internal quality factor of the resonators. We also compare the noise performance with and without vortices present, and find no evidence for excess noise beyond the increase in amplifier noise, which is expected with increasing loss.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Nonequilibrium quasiparticle distribution in superconducting resonators: effect of pair-breaking photons
similarity 0.88P. B. Fischer & G. Catelani · 2024 · arXiv:2401.12607
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-quality and field resilient microwave resonators on Ge/SiGe quantum well heterostructures
similarity 0.88Luigi Ruggiero et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.20238
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence processes in a current biased dc SQUID
similarity 0.87J. Claudon et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0601522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of resonances on the noise performance of SQUID susceptometers
similarity 0.87Samantha I Davis et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.03836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Millikelvin Nb nanoSQUID-embedded tuneable resonator fabricated with a neon focused-ion-beam
similarity 0.87Jamie A. Potter et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2412.16045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
An Ising-Glauber Spin Cluster Model for Temperature Dependent Magnetization Noise in SQUIDs
similarity 0.87Amrit De · 2014 · arXiv:1403.0124
Source status unknown — claims are unverified