Influence of resonances on the noise performance of SQUID susceptometers
Samantha I Davis, John R. Kirtley, Kathryn A. Moler
arXiv:1911.03836 · DOI 10.3390/s20010204 · 2019-11-10 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) Susceptometry simultaneously images the local magnetic fields and susceptibilities above a sample with sub-micron spatial resolution. Further development of this technique requires a thorough understanding of the current, voltage, and flux characteristics of scanning SQUID susceptometers. These sensors often have striking anomalies in their current-voltage characteristics, which we believe to be due to electromagnetic resonances. The effect of these resonances on the performance of these SQUIDs is unknown. To explore the origin and impact of the resonances, we have developed a model that qualitatively reproduces the experimentally-determined current-voltage characteristics of our scanning SQUID susceptometers. We use this model to calculate the noise characteristics of SQUIDs of different designs. We find that the calculated ultimate flux noise is better in susceptometers with damping resistors that diminish the resonances than susceptometers without damping resistors. Such calculations will enable the optimization of the signal-to-noise characteristics of scanning SQUID susceptometers.
Similar papers
Dual on-chip SQUID measurement protocol for flux detection in large magnetic fields
similarity 0.88Josiah Cochran et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.07559
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting microwave resonators with non-centrosymmetric nonlinearity
similarity 0.88M. Khabipov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.10133
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A theoretical model for parallel SQUID arrays with fluxoid focussing
similarity 0.88K. -H. Müller & E. E. Mitchell · 2020 · arXiv:2009.05338
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of the signatures of sub-resolution defects in two-dimensional superconductors with scanning SQUID
similarity 0.88Hilary Noad et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.00617
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synthetic areas spread in two-dimensional Superconducting Quantum Interference Filter Arrays
similarity 0.88Ross D. Monaghan et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2511.15020
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parasitic effects in SQUID-based radiation comb generators
similarity 0.88Riccardo Bosisio et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1505.06333
Source status unknown — claims are unverified