Interplay of the inverse proximity effect and magnetic field in out-of-equilibrium single-electron devices
Shuji Nakamura, Yuri A. Pashkin, Mathieu Taupin, Ville F. Maisi, Ivan M. Khaymovich, Alexander S. Mel'nikov, Joonas T. Peltonen, Jukka P. Pekola, Yuma Okazaki, Satoshi Kashiwaya, Shiro Kawabata, Andrey S. Vasenko, Jaw-Shen Tsai, Nobu-Hisa Kaneko
arXiv:1612.04116 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.054021 · 2016-12-13 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic field is shown to affect significantly non-equilibrium quasiparticle (QP) distributions under conditions of inverse proximity effect on the remarkable example of a single-electron hybrid turnstile. This effect suppresses the gap in the superconducting leads in the vicinity of turnstile junctions with a Coulomb blockaded island, thus, trapping hot QPs in this region. Applied magnetic field creates additional QP traps in the form of vortices or regions with reduced superconducting gap in the leads resulting in release of QPs away from junctions. We present clear experimental evidence of such interplay of the inverse proximity effect and a magnetic field revealing itself in the superconducting gap enhancement in a magnetic field as well as in significant improvement of the turnstile characteristics. The observed interplay of the inverse proximity effect and external magnetic field, and its theoretical explanation in the context of QP overheating are important for various superconducting and hybrid nanoelectronic devices, which find applications in quantum computation, photon detection and quantum metrology.
Similar papers
Magnetotransport Experiments on Fully Metallic Superconducting Dayem Bridge Field-Effect Transistors
similarity 0.89Federico Paolucci et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1808.00353
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for competition between the superconductor proximity effect and quasiparticle spin-decay in superconducting spin-valves
similarity 0.88B. Stoddart-Stones et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.13368
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heat transfer coefficient saturation in superconducting Nb tunnel junctions contacted to a NbTiN circuit and an Au energy relaxation layer
similarity 0.88Stefan Selig et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.3388
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Giant Mutual Proximity Effects in Ferromagnetic/Superconducting Nanostructures
similarity 0.88V. T. Petrashov et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9903237
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On-Chip Cooling by Heating with Superconducting Tunnel Junctions
similarity 0.88Giampiero Marchegiani et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.03638
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Superconducting Gap in an Insulator
similarity 0.87D. Sherman et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1112.0776
Source status unknown — claims are unverified