Superfluid density and carrier concentration across a superconducting dome: the case of SrTi$_{1-x}$Nb$_{x}$O$_{3}$
Clément Collignon, Benoit Fauqué, Antonella Cavanna, Ulf Gennser, Dominique Mailly, Kamran Behnia
arXiv:1703.00863 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224506 · 2017-03-02 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a study of the lower critical field, \hc1, of \STO as a function of carrier concentration with the aim of quantifying the superfluid density. At low carrier concentration (i.e. the underdoped side), superfluid density and the carrier concentration in the normal state are equal within experimental margin. A significant deviation between the two numbers starts at optimal doping and gradually increases with doping. The inverse of the penetration depth and the critical temperature follow parallel evolutions as in the case of cuprate superconductors. In the overdoped regime, the zero-temperature superfluid density becomes much lower than the normal-state carrier density before vanishing all together. We show that the density mismatch and the clean-to-dirty crossover are concomitant. Our results imply that the discrepancy between normal and superconducting densities is expected whenever the superconducting gap becomes small enough to put the system in the dirty limit. A quantitative test of the dirty BCS theory is not straightforward, due to he multiplicity of the bands in superconducting strontium titanate.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTi1-xNbxO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 89 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superfluid density and carrier concentration across a superconducting dome: The case of strontium titanate
similarity 0.93Clément Collignon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the vicinity of a ferroelectric quantum phase transition
similarity 0.90S. E. Rowley et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.08121
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate
similarity 0.90Clément Collignon et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.07067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The High Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates: Physics of the Pseudogap Region
similarity 0.89Paolo Cea · 2016 · arXiv:1604.05059
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature dependence and limiting mechanisms of the upper critical field of FeSe thin films
similarity 0.89M. Stanley et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.19241
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid Density in Conventional Superconductors: From Clean to Strongly Disordered
similarity 0.89Surajit Dutta et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.06697
Source status unknown — claims are unverified