Superfluid density and carrier concentration across a superconducting dome: The case of strontium titanate
Clément Collignon, Benoît Fauqué, Antonella Cavanna, Ulf Gennser, Dominique Mailly, Kamran Behnia
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a study of the lower critical field, Hc1, of SrTi1−xNbxO3 as a function of carrier concentration with the aim of quantifying the superfluid density. At low carrier concentration (i.e., the underdoped side), superfluid density and the carrier concentration in the normal state are equal within experimental margin. A significant deviation between the two numbers starts at optimal doping and gradually increases with doping. The inverse of the penetration depth and the critical temperature follow parallel evolutions as in the case of cuprate superconductors. In the overdoped regime, the zero-temperature superfluid density becomes much lower than the normal-state carrier density before vanishing all together. We show that the density mismatch and the clean-to-dirty crossover are concomitant. Our results imply that the discrepancy between normal and superconducting densities is expected whenever the superconducting gap becomes small enough to put the system in the dirty limit. A quantitative test of the dirty BCS theory is not straightforward, due to the multiplicity of the bands in superconducting strontium titanate.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SrTi1-xNbxO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superfluid density and carrier concentration across a superconducting dome: the case of SrTiNbO
similarity 0.93Clément Collignon et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.00863
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variation in superconducting transition temperature due to tetragonal domains in two-dimensionally doped SrTiO3
similarity 0.92Hilary Noad et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiorbital ferroelectric superconductivity in doped SrTiO3
similarity 0.90Shota Kanasugi & Youichi Yanase
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit-coupled ferroelectric superconductivity
similarity 0.90Shota Kanasugi & Youichi Yanase
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusual superconducting isotope effect in the presence of a quantum criticality
similarity 0.90Yaron Kedem et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate
similarity 0.90Clément Collignon et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1804.07067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified