Multi-component order parameter superconductivity of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ revealed by topological junctions
M. S. Anwar, R. Ishiguro, T. Nakamura, M. Yakabe, S. Yonezawa, H. Takayanagi, Y. Maeno
arXiv:1703.01814 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.224509 · 2017-03-06 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Single crystals of the Sr$_2$RuO$_4$-Ru eutectic system are known to exhibit enhanced superconductivity at 3~K, in addition to the bulk superconductivity of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ at 1.5~K. The 1.5-K phase is believed to be a spin-triplet, chiral $p$-wave state with the multi-component order parameter, giving rise to chiral domain structure. In contrast, the 3-K phase is attributable to enhanced superconductivity of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ in the strained interface region between Ru inclusion of a few to tens of micrometers in size and the surrounding Sr$_2$RuO$_4$. We investigate the dynamic behavior of a topological junction, where a superconductor is surrounded by another superconductor. Specifically, we fabricated Nb/Ru/Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ topological superconducting junctions, in which the difference in phase winding between the $s$-wave superconductivity in Ru micro-islands induced from Nb and the superconductivity of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ mainly governs the junction behavior. Comparative results of the asymmetry, hysteresis and noise in junctions with different sizes, shapes, and configurations of Ru inclusions are explained by the chiral domain-wall motion in these topological junctions. Furthermore, a striking difference between the 1.5-K and 3-K phases is clearly revealed: the large noise in the 1.5-K phase sharply disappears in the 3-K phase. These results confirm the multi-component order-parameter superconductivity of the bulk Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, consistent with the chiral $p$-wave state, and the proposed non-chiral single-component superconductivity of the 3-K phase.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.42 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Competition between d-wave superconductivity and magnetism in uniaxially strained Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.92Jonas B. Profe et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.10006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of deep superconducting gap minima and disorder on residual thermal transport in
similarity 0.92John F. Dodaro et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.00932
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multicomponent order parameter superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 revealed by topological junctions
similarity 0.91M. S. Anwar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unsplit superconducting and time reversal symmetry breaking transitions in SrRuO under hydrostatic pressure and disorder
similarity 0.91Vadim Grinenko et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.03600
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin susceptibility for orbital-singlet Cooper pair in the three-dimensional SrRuO superconductor
similarity 0.91Yuri Fukaya et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.06718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Polarization Enhanced by Spin-Triplet Pairing in SrRuO Probed by NMR
similarity 0.91K. Ishida et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.06421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified