Contrasting Phenomenology of NMR Shifts in Cuprate Superconductors
Jürgen Haase, Michael Jurkutat, Jonas Kohlrautz
arXiv:1703.04366 · DOI 10.3390/condmat2020016 · 2017-03-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shifts, if stripped off their uncertainties, must hold key information about the electronic fluid in the cuprates. The early shift interpretation that favored a single-fluid scenario will be reviewed, as well as recent experiments that reported its failure. Thereafter, based on literature shift data for planar Cu a contrasting shift phenomenology for cuprate superconductors is developed, which is very different from the early view while being in agreement with all published data. For example, it will be shown that the hitherto used hyperfine scenario is inadequate as a large isotropic shift component is discovered. Furthermore, the changes of the temperature dependences of the shifts above and below the superconducting transitions temperature proceed according to a few rules that were not discussed before. It appears that there can be substantial spin shift at the lowest temperature if the magnetic field lies in the CuO$_2$ plane, which points to a localization of spin in the $3d(x^2-y^2)$ orbital. A simple model is presented based on the most fundamental findings. The analysis must have new consequences for theory of the cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YBa2Cu3O6+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| YBa2Cu4O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| TlSr2CaCu2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6+y Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| HgBa2CuO4+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Ba2Ca2Cu3O6(F,O)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Ba2CaCu2O6(F,O)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Ca0.85Sr0.15CuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Y1-xPbxBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Tl0.5Pb0.5Sr2Ca1-xYxCu2O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr2Ca2Cu3O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Temperature independent pseudogap from O and Y NMR and the single component picture
similarity 0.91Marija Avramovska et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.10595
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Systematic (63)Cu NQR and (89)Y NMR Study of Spin Dynamics in Y(1-z)Ca(z)Ba(2)Cu(3)O(y) Across Superconductor-Insulator Boundary
similarity 0.91P. M. Singer & T. Imai · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0112234
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Planar Cu and O NMR and the Pseudogap of Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.90Marija Avramovska et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.07854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts
similarity 0.90Abigail Lee & Juergen Haase · 2026 · arXiv:2604.19215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Order and Fluctuations in BiSrLaCuO Revealed by Cu-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
similarity 0.90Shinji Kawasaki et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.08150
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional O and Cu NMR shift components in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Danica Pavićević et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.13079
Source status unknown — claims are unverified